martes, 9 de abril de 2013

North korea vs. Unitated States.
A war with no end.

 

SOME HISTORY
Lets know some of the history from these two countries: U.S. and Soviet forces occupied the two ends of the country in what was seen as a transition period before democratic elections. U.S. remained in the south, while the Soviet Union occupied the north. At the end of World War II, Korea was liberated from Japanese occupation decades and seemed destined to regain its independence, with allies-USA, China, Britain and the Soviet Union, supporting that goal. But as that cooperation in the war between the Soviet Union and the U.S. deteriorated, emerged two states in the south, the Republic of Korea, supported by the United States, in the north, the Communist Democratic Republic of Korea, with a leader, Kim Il-Sung, who had been trained by the Red Army. North Korea "was born as a monster". Once the war came to the end, U.S. presidents, Harry S. Truman and Dwight D. after Eisenhower publicly used the nuclear threat to try to end the war.
 
In 1994, the government of U.S. President Bill Clinton, was on the brink of war with North Korea, because of the violation by the latter to the international agreements to control nuclear.

In 2002, tensions flared again when North Korea expelled international nuclear inspectors amid concerns, later confirmed, that were secretly developing nuclear weapons.

"The Korean War is not over. Old enmities remain, at least in the eyes of Pyongyang".
 
NOW
The North Korean military warned Thursday that it has the final authorization to launch an attack against the United States using nuclear weapons eventually, according to a statement released by the state agency KCNA.
The North Korean Army General Staff said Washington formally made ​​known that U.S. threats will be "flattened" using "nuclear means modern, light and diverse," the statement said. "The operation mercilessly revolutionary armed forces in this respect has been finally examined and ratified," he said. "The operation mercilessly revolutionary armed forces in this respect has been finally examined and ratified," he said.
 
United States is willing to opt for diplomacy if North Korea meets its "international obligations", said the State Department spokeswoman, Victoria Nuland.
 "What we've been saying all the time is not overheated need more, we can change the way" if the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK) "calm things, take a break," he said.
 
North Korea, which already has two medium-range missiles on its coast ready to fire, warned Friday that it could not guarantee from April 10 security of diplomatic missions in Pyongyang in case of conflict.

 "The North Korean government discourse is that as of April 10 can not guarantee the security of embassies and international organizations in the country in case of conflict," said a spokesman for the British Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

"We think the North Koreans adopted this decision in the context of their offensive rhetoric according to which the U.S. is a threat," he added.
 
A senior U.S. military commander said on Tuesday the United States only intercept a missile if North Korea is a threat to Washington and its allies.
 


1 comentario:

  1. It's a lot of information but their history is quite long so I think you didn't miss any detail and I find this very analizing. They should find a way to unite again because once the US steps in... well I think we all already know! I hope the US stay in their own bussiness and step back from it.

    ResponderEliminar